INTRODUCTION:
Although El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is the strongest
climate signal on earth and has delivered the earliest and most
spectacular successes in climate forecasting, there appear to be
persistent limitations to improving ENSO-based forecasts. The
forecast value of La Niña conditions is of limited use during the
out-years because of the nonlinearity in the climate responses to El
Niño and La Niña, and the relative weakness of the climate
response to La Niña. This, and the lack of forecast potential of El
Niño in out-years provide impetus for extracting the added
predictability that lies with the interactions of other ocean
basins, and of the interannual time scale with the interdecadal time
scale. Therefore, while funding agencies and other scientists
continue to put needed effort into improving ENSO-based forecasts,
we have chosen to direct our emphasis on the latter aspects. We do
this with a specific geographic focus, which is to understand how
the ocean-atmosphere climate system conspires to affect rainfall and
tropical storm activity in the troposphere overlying the
Intra-Americas Sea (IAS). This includes the remote effect of the
Atlantic and Pacific, the IAS regional effects of the Western
Hemisphere Warm Pool (WHWP), and the interaction of ENSO with
decadal variability.
PROJECT GOALS:
Our continuing research – an outgrowth of our previous PACS
research – is aimed at (1) understanding how the ENSO variability
interacts with interdecadal variability, and (2) understanding the
WHWP: its seasonal and nonseasonal variability, how it is forced
(heat balance), and how it affects the IAS regional climate; and (3)
physically understanding how the Atlantic and Pacific sectors
interact to alter the rain-producing tropospheric structures
overlying the IAS and surrounding land regions. The research is
organized into three tasks around these objectives, and is being
done in roughly the same order.
METHODOLOGY:
We approach these tasks using statistical analyses of modern
data sets (Kaplan et al.; Da Silva et al.; the NCAR/NCEP atmospheric
reanalysis; and Xie and Arkin rainfall) to identify and diagnose the
physical relationships. The work will build on some of the published
results from our previous PACS research. For example, in the first
task (already completed) our previous calculation of a global ENSO
mode of SST anomaly (Figure
1) (Enfield and Mestas-Nuñez, 1999) is used to
separate the ENSO variability from the interdecadal variability in
the NINO3 index region, and the separate SSTA indices are used to
construct composite means of the tropospheric direct circulation
around the globe, with special attention given to the inter-American
sector. Our WHWP analysis has begun by describing the annual and
nonseasonal variability in the size and intensity of the warm pool,
and relating it to the surface fluxes to understand the heat
balance. In the latter stages of our work we plan to relate both the
Atlantic and Pacific variability and the IAS/WHWP variability to (a)
the tropospheric structures affecting static stability and rainfall,
and (b) the rainfall itself.
RESULTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Our early work (Mestas-Nuñez and Enfield, 2000) looks at the
tropospheric direct circulation associated with two components of
the NINO3 time series: the canonical ENSO and the residual (decadal)
components. The total, the ENSO and the residual NINO3 series are
shown in Figure
2. Notice how the canonical ENSO of the middle
plot (the global ENSO contribution) reproduces the warm and cold
events in the data (upper plot) but with a very different ranking
for the intensities (e.g., 1982-83 and 1997-98 are no longer
dominant). The difference is explained by the residual (lower plot),
which is mainly interdecadal in nature. In the paper we construct
composites of the 3-D tropospheric direct circulation associated the
canonical ENSO and interdecadal components, using the irrotational
velocity and velocity potential at 850 hPa (lower troposphere) and
200 hPa, (upper troposphere) the vertical velocity at 500 hPa
(middle troposphere). In Figure
3 we simply use the 200 hPa plots as a proxy and
compare each of the two anomalous composites to the long term boreal
winter mean (DJF). We see that the decadal circulation (warm phase)
is quite different from the ENSO circulation, especially over
northern South America and the Caribbean. This confirms that the
phase of Pacific decadal variability will have a large impact on the
tropospheric signal for ENSO, and suggests that El Niño (La Niña)
effects over that region will be more predictable when the decadal
mode is in its cool (warm) phase.
Our initial analysis of the WHWP (Figure
4) shows that the warm pool, as defined by the
28.5 °C isotherm, is minimal in January-February. It begins to
strengthen and expand over the eastern North Pacific in the boreal
spring. The warming and expansion continues into the Gulf of Mexico
in the early summer. Finally, the warm pool in the IAS region moves
south into the Caribbean and expands eastward into the tropical
North Atlantic, in the late summer and early fall. The WHWP area
index of water warmer than 28.5 °C undergoes a strong annual cycle
from nearly zero in winter to a maximum in September(Figure
5). It is during the May-October period of
warmest SST and greatest areal extent that large scale convective
systems develop overhead and the region experiences its greatest
rainfall and incidence of tropical storms. When the annual cycle of
the index is compared to the variability of individual months (lower
plot) we see that the interquartile range (dashed curves) of the
index are as large as the annual mean area.
In an analysis of the heat balance (Wang and Enfield, 2000) it is
clear that shortwave radiative influx is largely responsible for the
annual mean growth and decay of the WHWP. However, the nonseasonal
fluctuations seem to be controlled more by the feedbacks between the
cloudiness and back-radiation. Because the WHWP indices are
correlated with indices in both the Pacific (NINO3) and Atlantic (NATL),
it is unclear at this point what degree of independence the WHWP
anomalies have with respect to the neighboring oceans, or what the
sequence of cause and effect linking them may be.
FUTURE WORK:
We believe that the large nonseasonal variability in the
warm-water area (and intensity) of the WHWP will be reflected in the
conditioning of the lower troposphere and in the associated rainfall
and tropical storm development. Our future work will be aimed at
exploring these aspects through analysis of the NCEP reanalysis to
see how tropospheric thermodynamic structure and convective
processes vary between extremes of WHWP extent. We will similarly
analyze the effects of the Atlantic and Pacific, recently identified
by Enfield and Alfaro (1999). Later in 2000 our group hopes to be
joined by an OGP/UCAR post-doc (Alessandra Giannini), who plans to
analyze these same relationships through experiments with a
high-resolution regional model (MM5) of the atmosphere over the IAS
region.
PUBLICATIONS RESULTING FROM THIS RESEARCH:
NEW RESULTS
Mestas-Nunez, A.M and D.B. Enfield, 2000: Equatorial Pacific SST
Variability: ENSO and Non-ENSO Components and their Climatic
Associations., resubmitted to Journal of Climate
(two page summary postscript file for
download).
Wang, C. and D. B. Enfield, 2000: The tropical western hemisphere
warm pool. Submitted to Science.
RELEVANT PREVIOUS RESULTS
Enfield, D.B. and E.J. Alfaro, 1999: The dependence of Caribbean
rainfall on the interaction of the tropical Atlantic and Pacific
Oceans, Journal of Climate, 12:2093-2103.
Enfield, D.B. and A.M. Mestas-Nunez, 1999: Multiscale
variabilities in global sea surface temperatures and their
relationships with tropospheric climate patterns, Journal of
Climate, 12:2719-2733.
Landsea, C.W., R.A. Pielke, Jr., and A.M. Mestas-Nunez, 1999:
Atlantic basin hurricanes: Indices of climatic changes. Climatic
Change, 42: 89-129.
Mestas-Nunez, A.M and D.B. Enfield, 1999: Rotated global modes of
non-ENSO sea surface temperature variability, Journal of Climate,
12:2734-2746.
CONTACTS:
Principal Investigators:
David B. Enfield
enfield@aoml.noaa.gov
phone: (305) 361-4351
fax: (305) 361-4392
Alberto Mestas-Nuñez
mestas@aoml.noaa.gov
phone: (305) 361-4372
fax: (305) 361-4392
Chunzai Wang
wang@aoml.noaa.gov
phone: (305) 361-4325
fax: (305) 361-4392
Christopher W. Landsea
landsea@aoml.noaa.gov
phone: (305) 361-4357
fax: (305) 361-4392
Institution:
NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory
4301 Rickenbacker Cswy
Miami Florida, 33149
LINKS:
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov
Return to CLIVAR
PACS Home Page |